The Road to El Dorado – It’s Fun to Be a God

So here we are, at last. My second traditionally animated DreamWorks review! If you’ve not seen my first of these, then go check out The Prince of Egypt review right now. I mean it go on. I’m not starting until you’ve read it….. Read it yet? Well the hell with you then. Let’s get started, as we always do at The Chronic Chronicler, with the obligatory overview.

16.000000,16.000000It’s 1519 and Tulio (Kevin Kline) and Miguel (Kenneth Branagh) are two con artists in Seville, Spain have just finished getting the last of the thug Zaragoza (Tobin Bell) of his gold when he produces a map to El Dorado, wanting to bet it for all the money he lost. With Miguel believing its authenticity, he gets Tulio to gamble it all for it, using Zaragoza’s non loaded dice. They win, but are soon seen for the con men they are and, after brilliant acting and a chase scene, Miguel and Tulio accidentally get on board a ship to the New World.

The ship is that of Hernán Cortés (Jim Cummings) and he is less than pleased with the stowaways being on board and arrests them with the intention of putting them to work in a plantation in Cuba. Miguel and Tulio escape, with the help of Cortés’ rather intelligent horse Altivo (Frank Welker), but accidentally arrive in the New World.

The-Road-to-El-Dorado-the-road-to-el-dorado-18327284-500-282Recognising features from the map, Miguel convinces Tulio that they must search for El Dorado so that they can make their fortune and return to Spain. And guess what? They find it, but it’s inhabited and they are mistaken as “mighty and powerful Gods”. Now the con men turned deities must keep up the charade of Gods with the help of Chel, an El Doardo native who finds out about their con and joins in, playing the El Dorado Chief Edjo Tannabok (Edward James Olmos) and the High Priest Tzekel-Kan (Armand Assante) against each other while trying to load up a ship with all the gold they can get and return to Spain. But are the wonders, and the hidden wickedness, of El Dorado to be the undoing of the con man pair?

Now I must say from the start, I enjoyed this film a lot more than I did The Prince of Egypt. Now one could argue it’s because The Road to El Dorado is more of a generic adventure tale while The Prince of Egypt is an amazing, and brave, piece of cinematography depicting a Bible story, something which is hard to translate to the big screen.

Well that is partially true, as even I admit The Prince of Egypt was a brave piece of cinema for a fledgling DreamWorks that needs to be seen, but with The Road to El Dorado has a feeling of DreamWorks finding its feet with the film being a joy to watch.

Now I’ll admit that The Road to El Dorado does not have the animated refinement that The Prince of Egypt had. The Prince of Egypt had near awe inspiring animation, whereas The Road to El Dorado has animation which is serviceable, but isn’t going to be in the Top 10 Greatest Animation lists anytime soon.

maxresdefaultYet, despite this, it’s still lovely to look at. It’s clean and vibrantly coloured, almost making you forget that it’s not on a par with its predecessor. There is nothing wrong with its animation and, especially in the song “It’s Tough to Be a God” and in the higher octane moments of action, it has a life of its own which one really can’t compare to The Prince of Egypt.

One thing I found slightly weird about the film is its name. The Road to El Dorado. It gives you the impression that most the film will be spent journeying to El Dorado with the ultimate climax being its discovery. Well no, they only spend 24 minutes getting to El Dorado and the rest of the film is spent there. And of that the first 16 minutes are of them accidentally getting on Cortés’ ship and arriving in the New World. So the real actual journey only takes around nine minutes, allowing for a song, a confrontation, and the general jokes in between. OK, no more nit-picking on that scale, that’s just petty. Moving on!

Kevin Kline and Kenneth Branagh as Tulio and Miguel are brilliant choices for the buddy adventure. Kline gives Tulio a realistic schemer who knows how far they can go in order to pull their cons off while Branagh gives Miguel the feel of almost childish longing for more and believing that they can always go one step further. With an almost sibling-esque friendship, you find yourself wanting Miguel and Tulio to succeed.

Yet, despite being con men, they never seem to be out to hurt anyone. They are presented, in a sense, like Aladdin was eight years previously. They are men breaking the law, but they are characters of sympathy rather than revulsion, something you probably have to do for a family film. Even though they are out to get all they want from the “gullible” El Dorado native, they never want to hurt them.

Road-Eldorado-movie-01Chel (Rosie Perez) as Miguel and Tulio’s native assistant also brings humour and romance to the group. Perez makes what could have possible been a typical bimbo character which is solely there for the main characters to fawn upon a character of strength and humour. She has knowledge of native customs and practices and, where Miguel and Tulio (Miguel especially) can come off as a bit naïve, Chel reigns them in with her intelligence on her own people.

One thing I must be a little critical of though is the writers’ failure to give her a proper reason for joining Miguel and Tulio. When asked why she wants to join in on the con, Chel say it’s because she wants to escape El Dorado. When Miguel, a little confused on why someone would want to leave the city of gold, Chel just responds “Think you’re the only ones who dream of better things? Of adventure? You’ve got your reasons…. and I’ve got mine. Let’s not make it personal, OK?” The way she delivers this lines really implies something has gone on in he life to want to leave El Dorado, but it is never expanded upon, which was a really poor decision.

One thing I’ll quickly mention though is the handling of Chel’s relationship with Tulio (trust me; this doesn’t really spoil the film). For a family film with a focus on adventure and humour, this romantic subplot is handles really well because it isn’t made oh so sappy like many other films would have done it. Chel isn’t fawning over her love for Tulio nor vice versa, they seem to fall for each in almost a natural way, though Chel does use her femininity, and other physical features, to woo Tulio.

roadtoeldorado___4Even that seems to be a bit of a breath of fresh air as it is the woman chasing the man, and not vice versa as is usual in these films. But the thing I thought they handled best, and remember this is a family film, is the implication of sex. It’s pretty obvious that Tulio and Chel go all the way, but they handle it well, underplaying and also using it for comic effect. To do that in a sensible, almost adult way that doesn’t make it seem erotic (for lack of a better word) in a film children will watch is a sign of a pretty good film in my books.

But now we’re coming to the end of this review, so let’s just quickly go over some things rather briskly shall we? The music is well done, and not surprising seeing as how it was done by Elton John and Tim Rice, the same team that composed the music for The Lion King. The upbeat and positive nature of most the songs, like “The Trail We Blaze”, “Without Question” and, of course “It’s Tough to Be a God” making use of Spanish tunes as well as bombastic beats. Not only that, but Hans Zimmer gives great compositions for the music which has been really underappreciated.

Well, it was inevitable wasn’t it? Religion raises its head again in something which I think is going to be a theme for these reviews. I had no idea how much religion played a part in these traditionally animated films. I think it was quite brave of DreamWorks, after the fairly religious film The Prince of Egypt to cast the fanatical high priest Tzekel-Kan (who has a slight fixation for human sacrifices) as the villain.

Tzekel-Kan_grinning_evillyBut yes you could argue that the fact that a non-Christian religious figure is the villain, not help by his dark magical abilities, while the Christian Miguel and Tulio (as they are in all probability are) save the day is just another cheap jab at non-Christian ideologies. However, I must say that is nonsense as Cortés is a definite Christian and is portrayed as merciless and most definitely villainous, with Jim Cummings doing his trade mark villainous voice brilliantly. Miguel and Tulio, although as I said would have been Christians historically, are portrayed pretty much as secular, as they do not demean other people’s religions in favour of theirs. Indeed, even their act of being “Gods” isn’t really showing that their religion is wrong; rather it is solely used to for the purposes of the con and the fallibility of men. Also, DreamWorks does well to avoid the racism controversy Aladdin had suffered from as Tzekel-Kan does not have what may be considered a racist accent or stereotyping facial features which Jafar, as well as other characters, were said to have against the pale skinned, Anglo-American sounding protagonists.

Seeing how far I’ve gone I’ll end it there by saying that The Road to El Dorado is an unappreciated film that had a hell of a job to do. It had to follow up The Prince of Egypt, a blockbusting, star-studded, beautifully animated film on the Moses story. The Road to El Dorado has less attention paid to it because of The Prince of Egypt, in terms of staff and because of it, despite having more money in production costs, made a loss of $19 million.

BRoad_to_el_dorado_ver3ut The Road to El Dorado is friendly and fun. It puts me in mind of some of Disney’s underrated films like The Emperor’s New Groove or Atlantis: The Lost Empire. It even puts me in mind of Sinbad: Legend of the Seven Seas, a film we will be getting to in the course of this review series. They’ll never be remembered as classic, but you’ll probably be still watching them years later and still finding fun in them. So there we go, nothing awe-inspiring, but a fun film that satisfies while it’s around, and still will when it’s gone. Now I’m off to listen to “It Tough to Be a God” again, I can’t get it out of my head.

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “The Road to El Dorado – It’s Fun to Be a God

  1. Hey, it is me. Our reviewing are definitely different styles, and I never thought about the subtle religion in this film. I do agree with you on the good music and animation. I do feel that while the music is good, it does not fit in with the overall theme of a light, comedic adventure.

    I do not really see the comparisons between them and Aladdin. He was poor, and was seen as a downer and a scrub because he has no parents, is extremely poor, and loves on rooftops and shacks. He steals food to survive. Tulio and Miguel are outright criminals, and steal money to be rich. Aladdin knows what he is doing is wrong, but the latter twins just do not really care.They are also never put in a situation of sympathy, I think they should have been developed as characters and given more back story.

    The story is a bit too thin for my liking. I don’t know if Chel and Tulio are “in love”, but it is clear there is an attraction and sex buddies.

    You are a great reviewer and I do like your style. Keep up the great work.

    Like

    1. Hello there! Thanks for reading my review and thank you for the compliment!

      Now I must admit that I see your point on the story being thin, but then again a film doesn’t have to have an ocean of depth to be a good tale and that’s what I like about it. It’s brisk and fun without too much soul-searching, although a few puddles of depth could have been used at times.

      I see your point on my Aladdin comparison, but I was comparing Miguel and Tulio to Aladdin as all three of them are outright criminals in their day and ages. Aladdin, no matter what way you look at it, would have been considered a criminal then and probably still now. He was a thief and, despite his back story, would be treated as such. The same with Miguel and Tulio, who aren’t twins I think, but they share the likability that Disney gave Aladdin as, while they are all criminals, we grow to like them.

      I think Chel and Tulio do love each other, as per the “Please come to Spain with me bit”, but I understand why they could be seen as sex buddies. I think they would have had a stronger relationship had the sequels come about if the movie was successful, but as we all know that didn’t happen.

      Thanks for you points, they are really good (and I agree with you that more could have been put into Miguel and Tulio’s back story).

      Like

  2. This was a good read! I do not actually recall ever seeing this one! I am sorry to go off-topic but since you did mention it….I miss the hell out of Emperor’s New Groove. I loved the film and even bought all the video-games for PS1. Or maybe it was only one game? Not sure! I remember it being hard as hell strangely enough!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. No worries, go off topic if you want! The Emperor’s New Groove is such an awesome film. Shame it doesn’t get anywhere near enough love as it should do. It had games on the PS1? God I didn’t even know that. Cheers for reading though and you should definitely check out The Road to El Dorado if you enjoyed The Emperor’s New Groove!

      Like

    1. Hello there! Hey it’s fine, not every film is to everyone’s tastes. I do admit that the “oh these white people are gods” could be taken for racial insensitivity, but without it the film would not even get started. I think it’s meant to be a farce in that respect and not something to be literally true. I know that’s I felt when I first watched it when I was eight.

      I disagree with you on the leads. Yes they are smug, but they are loyal to each other, Miguel becomes fascinated with El Dorado’s people and culture, portraying them in a pleasant light, and are pretty funny in their buffoonish and sarcastic ways.

      I don’t see what was inappropriate about the film though. Chel was dressed very skimpily I’ll admit, especially compared to the fully clothed women, but I don’t think it’s for me to comment on how she dresses. Yes she’s dressed in a, for lack of a better phrase, “sexier” manner, but she is dressed in a less provocative than Jessica Rabbit from Who Framed Roger Rabbit? or Ariel from The Little Mermaid.

      Beside, on the implied sex scene, who cares if there was an implication of sex? Many animated films do it, e.g.: Toy Story, A Bug’s Life, Shrek, etc. Many children who see it won’t get, ask about and will be ignored or informed, or will be old enough to get it. I don’t think it’s vulgar.

      I’ll stop now but if you don’t like it, you don’t like it. What I say won’t change your opinion.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. smilingldsgirl

        I guess I would have made it an actual treasure hunting movie with clues and the like. If there were just a few moments with the native caricatures I could have ignored it but they find the city to quickly so it is rammed home again and again.
        The inappropriate elements did bother me but I can see what you are saying. I found it off putting. But you are right different strokes for different folks. 🙂

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s